Nongfu Spring is a bit annoying

Nongfu Spring filed a lawsuit against the “Jinghua Times” claiming 60 million. From April 10 to May 6, the “Jinghua Times” issued more than 20 reports, directed at Nongfu Spring, and Nongfu Springs responded for four consecutive times.

On the morning of May 6, Nongfu Spring posted a message on its official Weibo microblog, saying that Nongfu Springs had filed a lawsuit with the Intermediate People's Court of Beijing and demanded that the Jinghua Times compensate 60 million yuan for his reputation.

Earlier, the "Beijing Times" questioned the focus of Nongfushanquan on the issue of the use of standards by Nongfu Spring. Nongfu Spring's bottle label standard is DB33/383, DB is a landmark, is a bottled drinking natural water standard in Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang local standards than the national standard is more broad.

Nongfu Springs held a press conference to call for the "dignity" to close the Beijing factory. At 15 o'clock on the 6th, Nongfu Springs drew natural water to hold a press conference in Beijing. Nongfu Springs chairman Zhong Hao said that Nongfu Springs will not be reopened in Beijing to produce the plant. Because such an environment is impossible for a company to produce in such an environment, employees cannot use their normal minds in their own jobs. The dignity of Nongfu Spring is more important than money.

For the drinking problem of 100,000 Beijing users, Nongfushangquan said that within three months, 19 liters will be exchanged for 4 liters and 20 liters from all parts of the country. In the market, 19 liters of water is 20 yuan, 4 liters of water is 35 yuan, and Nongfu Springs decided not to let consumers suffer losses.

At the press conference, the gunpowder flavor product standard was still firmly held by the farmer. Nongfu Springs held a press conference in Beijing on May 6th. Nongfu Springs posted a report to the wall of the “Jinghua Times” and the two parties had more rounds of gunpowder. Controversy.

A few days ago, the Beijing Bottled Water Sales Association issued a notice advising the Beijing barreled drinking water industry sales companies to remove farmers' spring bottled water. Local reporters later visited a number of water stations and found that most of the water stations have taken measures to remove them. At the press conference, Nongfushangquan denied that its bottled water was unloaded in Beijing and said that because of the "public opinion environment", it stopped supplying people.

Nguyen N. Springs’ “Jinghua Times” “quivering” urged the authoritative department to vocal experts to believe that it is difficult for the public to judge whether Nongfu Spring is right or the “Jinghua Times” is right. The National Standards Committee should give an authoritative explanation.

There are many standards for drinking water, and the contents of various standards are almost inconsistent. Organizations that set standards should interpret their own standards, eliminate public doubts, and clarify corporate production standards. However, at present, it is very regrettable that nearly a month has passed since the standards-setting department and the department that implemented the standards have not given clear guidance, and these guidelines are exactly the root cause of the current disputes.

What is exposed behind the “standard door” of the farmer's mountain spring that is full of fog is the “absence” of the national standard for packaging drinking water. Regarding public health, the regulatory authorities must promptly make authoritative explanations before they can stop the "controversy" of enterprises and the media, safeguard the rights and interests of consumers, and block a "threshold" for various drinking water landmarks.